Afghan girls wait five years for class
Taliban officials maintain that now is not the time to reopen schools for female students, a stance critics say contradicts Islamic teachings and hinders national stability.
By Daniel Bernard ·

1,800 days have passed since Taliban leaders told most female students in Afghanistan to stay home. That number represents the time elapsed since the initial order, a period during which the ruling group has maintained that conditions are not yet suitable for girls to return to in-person schooling. The delay has stretched from a temporary pause into a multi-year exclusion that affects the majority of the country's young female population.
Natalie Gonnella-Platts, director of Global Policy at the George W. Bush Institute, argues that the current situation mirrors the Taliban's 1990s approach. She states that subjugating female Afghans and denying quality education are fundamental to the group's pursuit of power. According to Gonnella-Platts, this is not a more tolerant version of the regime but a continuation of the same ideological blueprint. She contends that elected leaders focused on counterterrorism should prioritize the Taliban's treatment of women as a security issue.
The Taliban claim that inclusive education contradicts Afghan culture and Islamic teachings. Gonnella-Platts notes that historians, Islamic scholars, and leaders of other Muslim-majority countries disagree. They view the exclusion of female students from in-person classes as unjustified. This disagreement highlights a disconnect between the regime's stated religious rationale and the consensus among many religious and academic authorities.
The ban persists while the country faces widespread poverty and food insecurity. Children continue to die from preventable illnesses, yet the Taliban withhold what is described as a key driver of development. Gonnella-Platts points out that from 2001 to 2021, education helped move Afghanistan forward. She explains that learning strengthened confidence and built resistance, while knowledge created opportunity for both male and female students.
The educational infrastructure is being repurposed to expand the Taliban's extremist mindset. Madrassas aligned with the group's interpretation of faith have replaced many secular schools. Unqualified educators lead classrooms, and corporal punishment is common. The curriculum now emphasizes propaganda that stokes bias against Western values. Jihadi madrassas have grown in number, and this indoctrination has continued unchecked for five years.
International engagement with the Taliban has increased despite a claimed posture of nonrecognition. Ministers from the Taliban regime appear in photos alongside international officials during bilateral meetings. Their diplomats have taken control of missions in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. In August 2026, diplomatic officials joined Taliban representatives to celebrate the fifth anniversary of the international withdrawal. The event featured ornate décor and ice sculptures.
Countries and organizations are pursuing engagement on trade, transportation, immigration, and defense. These discussions occur even as female Afghans are excluded from participating in many of these sectors. Gonnella-Platts argues that this lack of consequences has allowed the Taliban to become more brutal. She calls for targeted sanctions against officials, including Supreme Leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, who are currently not subject to such measures.
The Global Magnitsky Act has not been universally used to pressure those responsible for human rights abuses. Gonnella-Platts identifies this as a misstep. She also suggests holding nations accountable that host sanctioned Taliban officials without granting travel ban exemptions. These countries are rarely penalized for their actions, a practice she says must stop.
Support for female education in Afghanistan is described as smart security policy. On the front lines, individuals and organizations continue to fill the schooling void through underground or virtual classrooms. These groups cannot be expected to do the work alone. Gonnella-Platts argues that the Taliban should face designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. She also suggests naming the ministries they exploit as primary money laundering concerns under section 311 of the USA Patriot Act.
The topic of girls' and women's education remains inconvenient for the Taliban. Gonnella-Platts believes this should make it a priority for the rest of the world. The global community has a responsibility to push back, even if the situation in Afghanistan is complex. Afghans know the difficulty of their circumstances better than anyone, but that knowledge does not absolve other nations of their duty to act.
Source: Las Vegas Sun





